Shipping March 19, 2014
Moderator: Mr Wallstreet
- Tragic Angelus
- Posts: 3397
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:44 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Tragic Angelus
- Posts: 3397
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:44 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Stocky Boy
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:09 am
- Location: England, UK
- Stocky Boy
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:09 am
- Location: England, UK
- Tragic Angelus
- Posts: 3397
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:44 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Stocky Boy
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:09 am
- Location: England, UK
Why not do both?
I think to follow the 'adjectiveless' point more accurately it's not so much the fact that 'Dutch' isn't required in front of 'MGM'. It's that we need to display what MGM is not, in order to define MGM. From now on, so that we know when we are referring to MGM and not another MGM, we should use a description like, 'Not Non European MGM'. Then, it is clear that we are referring to the Dutch MGM.
But, actually maybe it's best to refer to MGM as, say, 'Tragic-less MGM' in order to distinguish MGM from Tragic Angelus. Or, '2099-less MGM', so that it's clear we are not talking about Wolf, when we are talking about Wally-less MGM.
I think to follow the 'adjectiveless' point more accurately it's not so much the fact that 'Dutch' isn't required in front of 'MGM'. It's that we need to display what MGM is not, in order to define MGM. From now on, so that we know when we are referring to MGM and not another MGM, we should use a description like, 'Not Non European MGM'. Then, it is clear that we are referring to the Dutch MGM.
But, actually maybe it's best to refer to MGM as, say, 'Tragic-less MGM' in order to distinguish MGM from Tragic Angelus. Or, '2099-less MGM', so that it's clear we are not talking about Wolf, when we are talking about Wally-less MGM.