Star Trek
Moderator: MGM
- Stocky Boy
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:09 am
- Location: England, UK
Star Trek
Bloody brilliant!
Go see it now!
Go see it now!
- jedispyder
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:47 pm
- Location: Cincy
- Stocky Boy
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:09 am
- Location: England, UK
I looked it up, but still don't know what you mean. 
There's one part in the film I want to discuss, but won't, since it's a bit of a spoiler, so hurry up you mofos and go see the film!
I was surprised at how Karl Urban didn't grate on my nerves as expected. He's come some way since Lord of the Rings and Xena Warrior Princess where all he could do was that one angry face. He was still doing it in the film, but with better control and variance. Maybe having to mimick a former actor's portrayal helped?
Chekov's voice seemed on the mark, but sounded ridiculous coming from the actor who looked nothing like Walter Koenig.
In this film, Kirk is played to be the classic american hero that hollywood execs believe all americans and by extention everyone else, can relate and only relate to, i.e. the kid from the broken home who's a rebellious knob-end that peculiarly shows great aptitude at everything in spite of his inherent knobheadedness and is destined for greatness. Oh and, he's a farm boy of course. I guess there's no exploitable drama if you come from a well adjusted, middle of the road family, right? Anyway... despite this, I didn't have a problem with the iconic american hero. Surface similarities to Shatner's Kirk may not have been present in this film, but fundamental traits were identifiable; ladie's man, daringness, cunning and ability to lead.
The plot was enjoyably simple and involves the very in vogue story telling troupe of 'time travel' to allow the refreshing of the brand to go it's own path and create it's own franchise without being bogged down with established continuity, all while keeping established Trek spirit alive.
Blockbuster of the fucking year, quite likely!
Incidently, Nokia must have paid a humungazoid ad premium, when you see the product placement they get in the film!

There's one part in the film I want to discuss, but won't, since it's a bit of a spoiler, so hurry up you mofos and go see the film!
I was surprised at how Karl Urban didn't grate on my nerves as expected. He's come some way since Lord of the Rings and Xena Warrior Princess where all he could do was that one angry face. He was still doing it in the film, but with better control and variance. Maybe having to mimick a former actor's portrayal helped?
Chekov's voice seemed on the mark, but sounded ridiculous coming from the actor who looked nothing like Walter Koenig.
In this film, Kirk is played to be the classic american hero that hollywood execs believe all americans and by extention everyone else, can relate and only relate to, i.e. the kid from the broken home who's a rebellious knob-end that peculiarly shows great aptitude at everything in spite of his inherent knobheadedness and is destined for greatness. Oh and, he's a farm boy of course. I guess there's no exploitable drama if you come from a well adjusted, middle of the road family, right? Anyway... despite this, I didn't have a problem with the iconic american hero. Surface similarities to Shatner's Kirk may not have been present in this film, but fundamental traits were identifiable; ladie's man, daringness, cunning and ability to lead.
The plot was enjoyably simple and involves the very in vogue story telling troupe of 'time travel' to allow the refreshing of the brand to go it's own path and create it's own franchise without being bogged down with established continuity, all while keeping established Trek spirit alive.
Blockbuster of the fucking year, quite likely!
Incidently, Nokia must have paid a humungazoid ad premium, when you see the product placement they get in the film!
- jedispyder
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:47 pm
- Location: Cincy
- Tragic Angelus
- Posts: 3397
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:44 pm
- Location: Indiana
I've never seen the original series, nor much of any of the later ones, but this movie was great. And I liked the setting up for the new reality.
I got a lot of the injokes and such from popculture references and some common knowledge, but this was really enjoyable for never having been a Star Trek fan. Really good, really fun movie.
I got a lot of the injokes and such from popculture references and some common knowledge, but this was really enjoyable for never having been a Star Trek fan. Really good, really fun movie.
- Mr Wallstreet
- Posts: 3734
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:21 pm
I thought he already had it?Mr Wallstreet wrote:The live action Green Lantern film, which starts filming in Sept or so, still has not cast the lead role of Hal Jordan, but there is speculation that Chris Pine, among a few others, is a top contendor for the role.
anyway FANTASTIC movie! i thought it was great! all around acation comesdy and drama!
- Tragic Angelus
- Posts: 3397
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:44 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Mr Wallstreet
- Posts: 3734
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:21 pm
Shockingly enough, I've never seen any episodes of the original Star Trek or the remakes so no suggestions here.
I finally saw the Star Trek movie over the weekend and yes it was a kick ass and fun film, but it didn't pump me up to the point where I began imagining what the sequel would be like. The story was interesting and didn't have a lot of plot holes in it, the cast had great chemistry, the dialogue didn't sound lame or forced and on occasion was quite funny.
Nothing in the film really stood out or stuck in my mind. Well that's not entirely true; Simon Pegg made me take notice but thats because I find him to be an enjoyable bastard. He's much better when he is part of a supporting cast with bit parts rather than a starring role. i.e. Mission Impossible III, Star Trek.
The only real criticism I have was about the plot device which I won't get into just yet. Not sure if everyone here has seen the film.
Overall, while it was thorougly entertaining, I'll wait till Transformers and G.I. Joe comes out before declaring ST the winner. On that note, finally getting to watch a full length trailer for G.I. Joe was nice. It looks good and I look forward to it.
I finally saw the Star Trek movie over the weekend and yes it was a kick ass and fun film, but it didn't pump me up to the point where I began imagining what the sequel would be like. The story was interesting and didn't have a lot of plot holes in it, the cast had great chemistry, the dialogue didn't sound lame or forced and on occasion was quite funny.
Nothing in the film really stood out or stuck in my mind. Well that's not entirely true; Simon Pegg made me take notice but thats because I find him to be an enjoyable bastard. He's much better when he is part of a supporting cast with bit parts rather than a starring role. i.e. Mission Impossible III, Star Trek.
The only real criticism I have was about the plot device which I won't get into just yet. Not sure if everyone here has seen the film.
Overall, while it was thorougly entertaining, I'll wait till Transformers and G.I. Joe comes out before declaring ST the winner. On that note, finally getting to watch a full length trailer for G.I. Joe was nice. It looks good and I look forward to it.
- The French Biscuit
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 9:04 pm
- Location: Deep in the Heart of Saskatchewan
The previous Star Trek movies with the original cast are pretty good, especially the later ones. Star Trek - The Wrath of Khan (1982) is a fun one, as is Star Trek - Generations which puts Kirk and Picard (Cpt. Picard that is from the Star Trek The Next Generation series) together for the first, and I believe only, time.Tragic Angelus wrote:It's actually got me interested in pursuing other aspects of Star Trek, though I know they won't be nearly the same as this film was. Any suggestions from anyone?
I know far too much about this.

Biscuit AWAY!
Your awesomeness is akin to bottling a hurricane. It cannot be done - Mr. Wallstreet
Your awesomeness is akin to bottling a hurricane. It cannot be done - Mr. Wallstreet
Have you seen the trailers for GI Joe and Transformers? They look awful, especially by comparison.Mr Wallstreet wrote:
Overall, while it was thorougly entertaining, I'll wait till Transformers and G.I. Joe comes out before declaring ST the winner. On that note, finally getting to watch a full length trailer for G.I. Joe was nice. It looks good and I look forward to it.
They gave the GI Joe guys super suits.
"French is like anal, exotic but oh so unnecessary."
- The French Biscuit
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 9:04 pm
- Location: Deep in the Heart of Saskatchewan
Saw it online and may even go so far as to buy it. That's how much I liked it.
I felt that the casting was pretty much bang on, and I concur with Stocky's comments about Karl Urban. He was a awesome Bones and I think it was because he was really trying to be the Bones all nerds like me know and love. Well done Karl, well done.
I was pleasantly surprised by the relationship that they included in the movie betwixt two of the main characters. Didn't see that one coming but I thought it was adorable.
Five flaming croissants out of five. Live long and prosper.
I felt that the casting was pretty much bang on, and I concur with Stocky's comments about Karl Urban. He was a awesome Bones and I think it was because he was really trying to be the Bones all nerds like me know and love. Well done Karl, well done.
I was pleasantly surprised by the relationship that they included in the movie betwixt two of the main characters. Didn't see that one coming but I thought it was adorable.

Five flaming croissants out of five. Live long and prosper.
Biscuit AWAY!
Your awesomeness is akin to bottling a hurricane. It cannot be done - Mr. Wallstreet
Your awesomeness is akin to bottling a hurricane. It cannot be done - Mr. Wallstreet