Dollhouse

MGM · Post by **MGM** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:56 pm

While that is true, the big appeal that Dushku has and those girl's don't is that she's Faith.

CountD · Post by **CountD** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:41 pm

I do not think she's all that.

I did not like this show (granted, first episode, but contrived and not a good premise)

CountD · Post by **CountD** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:41 pm

she is a terrible actor

MGM · Post by **MGM** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:45 pm

You can simply walk out and never return to this topic again.

wolf_2099 · Post by **wolf_2099** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:48 pm

A friend mentioned something to me to, that I felt was missing. The classic Whedon humor was gone. It was unofrtunate, I didn't realize how much I missed it till it was pointed out to me.

MGM · Post by **MGM** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:49 pm

I think this is not Whedon's show, but more a show he works on (I think I read somewhere that Dushku brought him in). I could be wrong about that, though?

wolf_2099 · Post by **wolf_2099** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:52 pm

MGM wrote:I think this is not Whedon's show, but more a show he works on (I think I read somewhere that Dushku brought him in). I could be wrong about that, though?

Pretty sure you are. I remember reading he developed the show with Dusku in mind as the lead.

I also can't see someone with Whedons history doing something other than his own.

Yup, created by Joss Whedon according to my googling.

CountD · Post by **CountD** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:12 pm

wolf, u r correct.

it did not have many whedonisms or whedonspeak to it.

or the humor..as mentioned.

MGM · Post by **MGM** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:14 pm

Too be honest, too much whedonisms get on my nerves. It was fun in Buffy, it was good it was less in Angel and it was annoying in X-Men.

Mr Wallstreet · Post by **Mr Wallstreet** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:58 pm

Is anyone keeping up with this?

MGM · Post by **MGM** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:01 pm

I found episode 2 to be even worse than episode 1. So far we know she's been active three times and two of those times she simply was an expansive fuck. There's something with a killing active, tralalalala... no, not really interesting.

Mr Wallstreet · Post by **Mr Wallstreet** » Tue Mar 03, 2009 7:50 pm

<sigh> and I had such high hopes for this show.

MGM · Post by **MGM** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:33 am

Yeah, and now it's only about eye candy.

wolf_2099 · Post by **wolf_2099** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:56 pm

Mr Wallstreet wrote:<sigh> and I had such high hopes for this show.

Wasn`t that last episode fucking terrible
I couldn`t even finish it.

MGM · Post by **MGM** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 4:41 am

Oy, that was by far the worst of them so far. I skipped through the entire thing. The only remotely interesting thing is that Helo's snitch is a Dollhouse active. But fuck, how boring it was.

Mr Wallstreet · Post by **Mr Wallstreet** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:05 am

Though it seems weak, I am willing to give it tme to grow and wow me.

This is the first of Whedon's shows that I didn't instantly like. First time for everything it seems.

wolf_2099 · Post by **wolf_2099** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 1:06 pm

I can't see how this is going to become good. I have yet to see anything good about it, not even the acting or dialogue.

Fasheem · Post by **Fasheem** » Sun Mar 08, 2009 12:29 am

I read an article about this show on Something Awful and bust a gut even though I'd never heard of the show before.

http://www.somethingawful.com/d/news/de ... whedon.php

XIII · Post by **XIII** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 10:37 am

So, isn't that show by that hack Wheddon guy? Must suck huge balls.

Also, I can't believe Edbert has contributed any single word to this thread.

MGM · Post by **MGM** » Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:40 pm

Dare I say the fourth episode was actually okay? I only watched that one because I read somewhere it wasn't bad. And I was surprised: it was pretty good. And no active hired out as an expensive hooker!