Page 1 of 1
So the whole Skrull thing
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:43 pm
by William McDert
Whatever happened with that? Was the dead cap a skrull? Any huge plots or whatever? sum it up!
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:50 pm
by wolf_2099
Nothing really. It was a Marvel summer event, of course nothing shocking came out of it.
Although, Shield was disbanded, and Hammer was formed. The Avengers and the Avengers Initiative and Hammer are all now run by Norman Osbourne.
See how long that lasts for.
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:54 pm
by William McDert
Lame.
And cap?
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:51 pm
by wolf_2099
William McDert wrote:Lame.
And cap?
Oh, he died, and has stayed dead.
Bucky took over.
Brubakers Captain America is phenomenal.
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:32 am
by XIII
William McDert wrote:Lame.
And cap?
I wouldn't call it lame. It makes no sense at all but it creates a new statu quo that intrigues me.
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 2:39 pm
by Stocky Boy
Basically it took as from regitered superheros run by a good guy to registered superheros run by a bad guy.
It provided a narrative theme, but getting there was a bit contrived.
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 1:11 am
by Goshin
THE MU OUTSIDE OF THE XMEN BEEN LOOKING REAL INTERESTING THE LAST 3 YEARS WITH ALL THESE CRAZY PLOT TWISTS BUT THE BUCKY CAP THING MAKE A LOTTA SENSE
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 1:32 am
by wolf_2099
XIII wrote:I wouldn't call it lame. It makes no sense at all but it creates a new statu quo that intrigues me.
That is the only thing I like about the ending. It is rather cool. But fuck, they need to explain why no one in the public is saying anything about Osbourne being nuts.
Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 1:55 am
by Goshin
wolf_2099 wrote:That is the only thing I like about the ending. It is rather cool. But fuck, they need to explain why no one in the public is saying anything about Osbourne being nuts.
because he's marvel's lex luthor