Page 1 of 1

Marvel announces "First X-Men"

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 3:19 pm
by Mr Wallstreet
"Something must have happened before Professor X became Professor X," Adams said. "He could pass. He didn't look like a strange X-Man. He didn't look like a mutant."

Adams posited the concept was that Professor X wasn't the person who started protecting young mutants. "Maybe this was going on when Professor X was a teenager and mutants were being abused by the government … and somebody stepped out to protect these kids. … Who would he be and why would he go to Charles Xavier? … That became my premise."

Lowe described the premise as "something X-Men fans would go nuts for," mentioning Adams had worked with the character of Wolverine before.

Adams described the series as "maybe groundbreaking." "It's the X-Men before the X-Men," he said, going on to say they were "maybe a disaster."

The artist also mentioned the involvement of Wolverine in the X-Men and why he keeps coming back. "How deeply entrenched is Wolverine to the X-Men? I think very, very deeply."
Full article
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page ... e&id=38666

I believe it'll be a miniseries with Neal Adams drawing and Christos Gage writing. I've never been a huge fan of Adams but I like his work as well as Gage's. It sounds fun, however, I'm not too thrilled about the idea of Wolverine being the central character of yet another X-book. I'd like the idea better if the First X-Men were led by a someone who is now dead or better yet a washed-up has-been loser.

Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 6:31 pm
by jedispyder
It has been talked about for a month or so, a lot of people are pissed that they're making Wolverine and Sabretooth "first X-Men" this way.

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:34 pm
by XIII
I'm staying away from this. Anyone who has seen what Neal Adams' work looks like now will reasonnably do the same.

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 10:42 pm
by Tragic Angelus
Yeah. Neat idea tho I feel it's been done before, but the art looks horrible. I like classic Adams art but this just doesn't look good. A lot of classic artists just have not transitioned to modern work and it's a shame but I have no interest in this mostly due to the artwork.

Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 6:00 am
by Mr Wallstreet
I still Neal Adams art looks okay. Its not great but good enough to get me interested.